Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP)
Leap.cc WWW
Blogs
of 1
Main JamesA's Blog Displaying 5 results per page
The following is a list of JamesA's blog entries, in reverse order

Wednesday, October 17, 2007 (16:20:03) - No Pattern or Rules to DEA Attacks
Patients and advocates often ask if there’s any pattern to DEA raids. This a common and understandable question–as human beings we want a predictable and sensible universe. And this natural impulse to seek patterns is exploited by all psychological terror groups in a number of ways. (I include the DEA as a psychological terror group because 1) they are losing the war on medical marijuana and must resort to ever more desperate tactics, and 2) because they are part of the US government which openly condones torture and preemptive warfare–clearly a dangerous and ruthless adversary).

There are two basic ways to exploit this human desire for patterns:

1) Be utterly random–this generates fear and leaves the victim completely without any pattern to rely on–think of random car bombings and how demoralizing that must be, the only protection is to never go out in public or to leave the area.

2) Create the appearance of patterns and then break them. This is good because it leaves the victim eternally vigilant and seeking for and inventing non-existent patterns. In experiments with animals this is called “experimental neurosis.” It is a proven method of driving mammals crazy and leads to fits and frenzies of self-biting, mania, and catatonia. The DEA and the US government are well aware of this dimension of psychological warfare.

They truly believe it is a war and that we are the enemy. They are not interested in debating this issue or in allowing different states to try different approaches. To the DEA, we are evil and must be eradicated–or intimidated into surrender.

Given all that, the DEA does three things:

1) it throws darts at a map (randomness),

2) it looks for maximum propaganda value (what story can they tell to make us look bad?–and those are indeed narrative patterns), and

3) individual offices in the various geographical areas have to justify their existence for continued funding and positive job evaluations (it is after all a job in a bureaucracy–once in a while, you got to do something), this leads to the “low hanging fruit” pattern.

So we have the following patterns:

1) Randomness–to keep us all on our toes, and to keep us fooling our selves with silly stories like, “You only get busted if you . . . (fill in the blank: advertise, don’t advertise, are public, are private, for profit, non-profit–it might make you happy but there are now examples to prove every such “rule” both true AND false–the DEA is very Zen that way).

2) Propaganda Narratives–front for legalization; front for criminal gangs; front for “able-bodied urban youth gangs” (code for young people of color); danger to the environment; “profiteers”; corrupters of youth; gonna getcha daughter; pot stronger than ever; grow houses gone amok; conspiracy; terrorist funders; etc, etc–all basically Reefer Madness Redux. Think of the recent 60 Minutes coverage which fell into this to some extent. Think of any DEA press conference and you will clearly see one of these narratives.

3) Low Hanging Fruit–who would you want to go after: a well-organized 100 million a year crack, heroin and meth distribution network (which can now be found in any part of America, rural or urban or in between, thanks to 30 years of ramped up prohibition)–or a bunch of peaceful medical cannabis advocates, sitting there with no violent inclinations at all and a sign hanging up saying Medical Cannabis–Come and Bust Us, We Will Lie Down on the Ground? Yeah, me too. So when you need to bump up your stats (or you need to justify that useless multi-agency task force’s multi-million dollar budget that aint done jack all year), whip up a “year-long investigation” (what takes a year to figure out that they are selling marijuana in there? duh) and put on the flak jacket, round up the SWAT team and go kick some ass. Oh yeah, and extra bonus points if you can bust a person of color, or a youth, or someone with a record, or someone who’s doing it right and actually balancing the books, generating a surplus and paying all their taxes–then you can use their financial statements against them (ask their CPA politely and s/he’ll print them out for you)–and you can seize their bank accounts and literally pay tribute to your bosses (maybe in the tens or hundreds of thousands–oh, was that why they waited a year? So they could steal your money?), Hi Boss, the task force brought in $200K this morning–and rounded up some dangerous sick people who provide a medical service. Well, it’s a job and the benefits are good–and the potheads NEVER shoot back.

At least, those are the only patterns I see, but maybe I’m missing something. (Oh yeah, and I hear busts usually happen on Wednesdays. Go fishing on Wednesdays.)

And, yes, I’m really sorry that I can’t give you the “rules,” so we never have to worry about being busted. The DEA is not rules-based. It is our enemy–distribute cannabis, and you are fair game for capture, torture, imprisonment, kidnapping, and loss of all property (the only thing left is attainder of blood– where they curse your entire family name for all time to come, but give them a minute to work it out).

Of course you can sweeten the odds: have your city government and neighbors love you, be white, sit in a wheelchair, change your last name to Bush, be extremely lucky, turn around three times counter-clockwise every morning and say the Hail Mary backwards. I wish I could add sincerity to the list, but I’m not quite that naive. Still, it couldn’t hurt, as long as you’re real with yourself about the rest of it.

Here’s my advice, which I give to every potential client at the first meeting: Don’t do it (for all the reasons given above and more). And I totally understand that most of them walk away. That’s a good thing. If they go for it anyway, I call that committed. And that’s a good thing too. But just be real. And be smart.

Anyone who operates a dispensary has an extremely high risk-comfort level, or you could say, is either a hero or a fool.

Comments (7)

Tuesday, December 05, 2006 (09:40:16) - The new face of drug reform

James Anthony “COPS SAY LEGALIZE DRUGS—ASK ME WHY,” blared the T-shirts on a dozen volunteers as I walked into the Drug Policy Alliance national conference at the Long Beach Marriot Hotel last November. And they all looked like cops too, big burly guys with short hair, except for a few cop wives and a couple of guy who might have been undercover narcs.  I had paid a lot of money from my nonprofit salary for registration, hotel, car, and airfare from Oakland to learn more about drug policy reform. I was afraid that I was going to get down there and be surrounded by thousands of old hippies in a big joyous be-in. Well, I’d just walked in and already there were cops—screamingly open cops, who’d walk right up to you, shake your hand, look you in the eye, and say, “We should legalize all drugs because that’s the only way we’re ever going to control them.” Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) was in the house in a big way.

The drug policy reform movement is not just old hippies anymore. It’s not just people who love drugs. It’s people who hate drugs (and want to control them effectively) and people who don’t care about drugs (but care about the $70 billion the US wastes every year on the socially harmful, but politically expedient, war on drugs). It’s churches and formerly incarcerated persons and the labor movement and nice straight middle-class college students from the mid-west who feel guilty that they get to go to college, but that kids from the inner-city with a drug conviction can’t because they can’t get financial aid. It’s is not just those conservatives who realized years ago that the drug war makes no sense economically, but even the Wall Street Journal in the last two weeks turned the corner and raised the question of whether the drug war does more harm than good.

The drug policy reform movement is everywhere and nowhere more surprisingly—and more rapidly expanding—than among law enforcement personnel. LEAP’s members include not only police officers, but also drug prosecutors, judges, and  prison guards from all over the country. Started just a few years ago, LEAP now has over 5,000 members, and a goal of 10,000 this year. LEAP also has a “friend” category for non-law enforcement people who support them, with a goal of a million friends this year.

LEAP’s strategy for ending the war on drugs is to use their credibility as speakers in very heartland settings such as Rotary Club meetings. LEAP’s speakers bureau is over 100 strong now and growing.  They make a very convincing presentation that the war on drugs has failed to reduce the drug problem, and has actually made it worse and caused untold harm to individuals, to families, to communities, to minorities, to law enforcement itself, and to our nation and the world. They then throw open the question of what to do next if what we’re doing isn’t working. Each speaker has their own theories on what detailed shape legalization should take, but all agree that the American people can come up with a better system once they realize how bad and unworkable the war on drugs is.

For more information on LEAP, and to join as a member or friend, see www.leap.cc

James Anthony is a LEAP speaker and an award-winning former Oakland civil drug prosecutor, now practicing land use law. He can be reached at Anthony@leap.cc

Comments (0)
of 1

Dedicated to our departed colleagues who courageously spoke out about the destructive policy of Drug Prohibition

Jerry Paradis

Eleanor Schockett

Gil Puder

Whitman Knapp

John Perry

Ralph Salerno

Bob Owens

Eddie Ellison

Martin Haines

The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners
We are not responsible for comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster

Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy